← Complete research archive
Evaluation & auditsClosed / no-go81 lines

R12 DRS Causal Cycle Result

- Slurm job: 691847 on evc33 - Accounting: COMPLETED 0:0, elapsed 00:32:18 - Report: artifacts/evals/drs causal cycle post drs r3.json - Report SHA-256: 0b927fee009de5e5cf87971ecaf390c716d6d9acb5644cabe3c176f6da9d4e7a - Report mode: 0444 on Newton and the local mirror - Audit ide…

R12_DRS_CAUSAL_CYCLE_RESULT.mdOpen original Markdown ↗

R12 DRS Causal Cycle Result

Status: canonical r3 diagnostic completed; mechanically valid; residual-only autonomous-cycle hypothesis rejected.

Frozen execution

  • Slurm job: 691847 on evc33
  • Accounting: COMPLETED 0:0, elapsed 00:32:18
  • Report: artifacts/evals/drs_causal_cycle_post_drs_r3.json
  • Report SHA-256: 0b927fee009de5e5cf87971ecaf390c716d6d9acb5644cabe3c176f6da9d4e7a
  • Report mode: 0444 on Newton and the local mirror
  • Audit identity: drs_causal_cycle_post_drs_v3
  • Cases: 50, with ten from each frozen regime
  • Mechanical validity: pass
  • Cached identity token mismatches: 0
  • Teacher-forced identity failures: 0

The checkpoint, heldout set, tokenizer, and five scientific-source hashes in the report match the r3 preregistration. The job executed from its verified private snapshot under canonical CUDA BF16 mode.

Locked endpoints

EndpointResultFrozen decision
Baseline first-state exactness38/50 = 76%diagnostic
Counterfactual residual first-state exactness14/50 = 28%write/serialization fail
Same-target residual first-state exactness31/50 = 62%no native rescue signal
Direct two-token ceiling first-state exactness50/50 = 100%pass
Paired next-call active-digit switch40/50 = 80%insufficient for consumer pass
Integrated residual-authored two-call cycle9/50 = 18%fail
Irrelevant-transplant argmax invariance49/50 = 98%pass
Irrelevant-sham token equality49/50 = 98%pass

The counterfactual residual arm was below the preregistered aggregate threshold and below the per-regime floor in fit_w4 (10%) and value_ood_w6 (20%). The two-token ceiling was 100% in every regime.

Same-target residual replacement rescued 5/12 baseline failures (41.7%) but reduced overall first-state exactness by 14 percentage points. It therefore fails both native-residual rescue criteria.

The paired active-digit switch cleared its aggregate threshold, but the full consumer gate failed because teacher-forced carry accuracy was only 60% for the base state and 50% for the counterfactual state. Teacher-forced digit accuracy was substantially stronger at 90% and 88%, respectively. Several per-regime carry and digit rates also missed the frozen 50% floor.

Diagnosis

The post-DRS model contains a causally active late digit-bearing residual, but that fact is not an autonomous reasoning cycle. At the tested layer and interface, the residual does not reliably author the required digit/carry text, transport the intended state, and support the following transition. Directly forcing the two target tokens removes the first-state failure completely, so non-field serialization is not the bottleneck. The carry interface and its next-step consumption remain materially weaker than the digit path.

This closes the decode-only interpretation of the residual workspace. It does not show that a learned low-dimensional state bus is impossible. Any successor must explicitly train and score the state-to-token actuator, carry update, and unpatched multi-step consumption rather than treating a linearly decodable residual as sufficient.

Authorized next work

  1. Keep the terminal-carry/width factorial curriculum as the data identifiability test; the old DRS corpus cannot distinguish the intended transition rule from the terminal-carry-zero alternative.
  2. Admit a compact carry/cursor packet architecture only behind matched-token, matched-update, and ordinary-SFT controls.
  3. Require autonomous two-step and width/value-OOD tests with no oracle residual or token injection before any reasoning claim.
  4. Reject any architecture that grows the packet into a result tape, depends on generated-token KV state, or wins only through extra supervision or compute.

The report is a localization result, not a capability improvement and not a reasoning claim.